Image Of The Turks

The Image of the Turks         Through push through history the faggot Empire was looked upon as having a barbaric and lustful multitude. This was the notion of a absolute majority of Western Europeans. Andrew Wheatcroft wrote The fags to signal on the dot how the Europeans did look on the Turks. This news report shows how the feelings toward the Ottomans created stereotypes that lasted centuries.         The Europeans looked upon the Turks as cut down forms of compassionate beings, much give care Adolf Hitler finded the Jews during realism war II. Europeans were prejudiced towards the Turks because they did not understand the Muslim bulk or their religion. Wheatcroft used a quote by Francis Bacon to show the toughness of the Europeans in the sixteenth-century: With come on goodity, without letters, arts or sciences; a batch that mint sc arce measure an acre of land or an minute of arc of the daylight; base and slutti sh in building, diet and the desire; and in a word, a very(prenominal)(prenominal) reproach to human confederation¦it is truly said concerning the Turk, where the Ottomans horse sets his foot, throng get along with up very thin (231). The Turks were considered to be a very dangerous group of people. The Europeans were really scared of them. They would meet in battle and thousands of crazy Turkish warriors called bashi-bazouks would appear, rampaging with swords in the shape of a crescent. The Europeans had never seen whatsoever thing like this before and they didnt enjoin what to think. These bashi-bazouks fought like no other warriors and were similar to modern day Marines in being the first line of defense. The Europeans looked at these bashi-bazouks as bloodthirsty savages (234). They were accused of raping the women and pillaging the cities they would conquer, knowing good and substantially that the Europeans would do the same when they conquered a city or nation. Wheatcroft writes, The simple(a) ! folk drawings from the Greek War show Egyptian soldiers and janissaries flushed death Greek women, while Greeks (in their white kilts) are just shown attack enemy soldiers. Yet we know that many thousands of Turkish women and children were killed, lots with appalling atrocity, in the Morea (234). In India, when the British were a commutation power from 1857-8, there were similar acts of savagery performed by the British. They were on a campaign of racial terror, hanging closely any Indians on whom they could get their hands in an debauchery of requital (235-6). They sought to torture these people because hanging was likewise quickly a death for such terrible people. iodin voice of the torture inflicted upon the Indians is included in Wheatcrofts book: The well-nigh established form of dispatching mutineers to strap them to the front of a cannon, and heat up them in half, often so that their scattered remains would boast the faces of their fountain comrades , lined up to observe the execution (236).         These acts of savagery by the Europeans were just as bad and sometimes worsened than what was through by the Turkish people. The Europeans fear of these mad Turks caused a dower of racial strife in which the Europeans turned all expression of the Ottoman Empire into a reproach of society. These views of the Turkish people did not fade a bearing with the fall of the Ottoman Empire. evening to this day, Europeans carry a certain fear of the Turks. Wheatcroft explains: The reach of the Turk, fade away and constantly reforming, will never be free from its cabalistic roots: In European fears of conjure and violence looming out in the East (239).         It was not that the Turks were worse than the Europeans, it was just that they were different. They believed in a religion, Islam, which had very different moral standards from Christianity. Since it wasnt the same smell of the Europeans an d their Catholic religion, it was considered wrong. ! This is similar to the way mainstream Christians view the religions that consider the intervention of snakes to be part of their worship service. These fantastic religions are often the victims of stereotypes and misunderstandings concerning their beliefs.          In The Ottomans, Wheatcroft uses many examples to illustrate the conflicts in the European and Turkish beliefs that caused the prejudices between the two. He proves that stereotypes are not always to be taken as fact. The only way to get erstwhile(prenominal) labels on other people is to find out for yourself who people really are. If you want to get a safe essay, allege it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper