Chomsky and Knowledge of Language Essay example -- Philosophy of Langua

The lingual possible action of Chomsky has changed the long, traditionalistic way of landing fielding language. The nature of acquaintance, which is closely tied to human knowledge in general, makes it a logical step for Chomsky to generalize his theory to the study of the relation between language and the world-in particular, the study of truth and reference. But his theory has been controversial and his proposal of innate ideas has been resisted by some empiricists who characterize him as rationalist. In our view, these empiricists make a mistake. In the present paper we wait to his position regarding linguistics as a science of mind/brain, which we believe is an important aspect of his theory that has not been paid enough perplexity or understood by his opponents. In turn, this will help to elucidate some of the confusions around his theory. Finally we will discuss some of the line of workatical issues based on the outlines we draw. 1Chomskys linguistic theory is based on the following empirical facts child learns language with limited stimuli, or the problem of poverty of evidence. (1) The insert during the period of a natural language learning is circumscribed and degenerate. The output simply cannot be accounted for by the learning machine only, such as induction and analogy on the input. The output and input differ both in quantity and quality. A subject knows linguistic facts without instruction or even direct evidence. These empirical facts, knowledge without foothold, (2) are expressed Knowledge of language is normally attained with brief exposure, and the character of the acquired knowledge may be largely predetermine. (3) This predetermined knowledge is some notion of structure, in the mind of the talker , which gu... ... but can hardly exist apart from languages, how could it be in the mind prior to language? What are those ideas? (Goodman, 1969, p.141)(24) He adds an interesting points Nevertheless, I think that what is significa nt in his paper is the fact that he believes that a genetic account is relevant to certain fundamental epistemological questions be at the foundation of language. (Harman, 1969, p.170)(25) Quine, 1969, p.95. Also Lewis, Davison, Searle (Chomsky, 1986).(26) Quine, 1972.(27) The state SL is attained by set parameters of So in one of the permissible ways, this is essential part of what is learned, pliable the core, and adding a periphery of marked exceptions on the basis of specific experience, in accordance with the markedness principles of So.(28) Nagel, 1969, p.172.(29) Chomsky, 1986, p.269.(30) Danto, 1969, p.136.