Life in New England Opposed To The Chesapeake Bay In The 1600s :: American America History

Life in overbold England Opposed To The Chesapeake mouth In The 1600sDuring the 1600s, many people in the American colonies led very many different lives, some let out than others. While conduct was hard for some groups, other colonists were healthy and happy. 2 groups that display such a difference are the colonists of sweet England and Chesapeake Bay. unseasoned Englanders enjoyed a much nobleer standard of living. This high standard of impertinently Englands was due to many factors, including a healthier environment, better family situation, and a high rate of reproduction.First, the inhabitants of the rude(a) England area were far healthier. Their clean water run was a sharp contrast to the contaminated waters of Chesapeake Bay. Air was also fresh and clean in New England. Chesapeake Bay colonists were plagued by disease due to their unsanitary way of life, and New Englanders could expect ten pleonastic years of life because of migrating there in fact, on average, th ey lived to be some 70, close to the same life expectancy as today.Second, those who migrated to New England tended to fall over as families, quite dissimilar to the single men who deluge Chesapeake Bay. Obviously, a much more stable family life took root in New England. Single women in Chesapeake Bay were a couple of(prenominal) and far between, and the few that were around were not single for long. It was much easier to establish families in New England, where the balance between men and women was much closer to equal. These strong families provided shelter and made the New England colonists live a more stable life than those who lived to the south in Chesapeake Bay.Finally, partially due to the stable family life of New England, reproduction was much steadier in the north than in the Chesapeake Bay region. New Englands women married young, around 20 years of age, and had many infantren before their child bearing days were over. They could expect to have at least 10 children, with 8 of them surviving. Chesapeakes lack of families-and more importantly-lack of women kept reproduction rates from creation up to par. Thus, New Englands growth was steady a nd stable, whereas Chesapeake Bay suffered the effects of an extremely low growth rate.