The Brown vs Board of Education Case

cubic decimetre years ago when the termi tribe was handed down in the brown vs Board of Education shield segregated school systems came to a skreak halt. Five decades later there be still hot debates on the effectiveness of such a ruling. Today, while schools are non de jure segregated, there are segregation trends because of the way populations gather in areas and the local anesthetic schools are impacted by such populations. Laws have been in pop out to prevent segregation and fryren have been bused across town to try and execute racial residuum, but recent changes to legislation have stopped that as well. Today, the nation is divided on the segregated school issue one time again.The main theme of the first article is that segregation in schools today, does non take on the aforesaid(prenominal) meaning as it did when the Brown decision was handed down. Today, according to the author population imbalance has to a greater extent to do with population desires to be locat ed near each other, as is the case with many Spanish speaking and European areas of the nation(Mckenna 1995).According to the author, segregation in this case is a positive thing as it places people of the same language in the same area thereby reducing cultism and inability to function until the children can develop stronger English skills(Mckenna 1995).The author believes that the conclude to racism is not to force busing or other methods that will delegate children in several(a) school populations. Instead, the author believes racism can be ended by working on society as a whole and embracing the very differences that gain America the nation that it is today.For the to the highest degree part I agree with the article. I know if I did not speak English I would be hesitant to allow my child to be bused across the city just for the sake of racial balance within the school system. I would prefer to keep them close to a familiar area with their familiar language being spoken.I d o not agree however with the statement that segregated schools are not evil. I believe there is a fine line among not pushing kids and letting them be left behind. If we do not force the balance of race within the school system we must(prenominal) instead be very careful not to let the nonage school systems fall by the wayside when it comes to funding and other things that make education possible.In the second article the author believes that segregated schools rove certain students at a detriment. Citing the problems including not preparing children for a naturally diverse society the author believes it is essential to mix the races while students are four-year-old enough to embrace such cultural differences(Droesch, 1996).With or without a desegregation plan in place, many of our children continue to experience segregation and racial bias in school. If our children continue to live in racially polarized communities and aid segregated schools, they will be at a distinct disa dvantage in todays global village. For all of our regions youth to meet the challenges of working in a multicultural world, they must have the opportunity to learn in an environment that advocates inclusion and respect for diversity(Droesch, 1996).The author believes desegregation plans for school systems is a beginning step to solving the problem of racism in America.I agree that segregated schools will cause a continued polarized attitude. I agree with the author that we must prepare our nations children for a racially diverse community. I believe it is important to reach students when they are young and most open to diversity. This will assist in the nations global effort to stop racism.I agree more with the second article than the first one if language barriers are interpreted out of the equation.