The Virtue and Vice of Reason in Mores Utopia Essay -- Thomas More Ut

The Virtue and Vice of Reason into a greater extents Utopia When power permeates decree, it does not necessarily imply greater happiness. When brought to the point of rationalization, or when thither are errors in the analysis used in caseing, undercoat tends to call for adverse resultant roles. On the other hand, when analysis is well thought out, and the tame conclusions are drawn, land can have an oerwhelmingly positive effect on a society. Many may think that Sir Thomas Mores Utopia infers that reason must be the foundation, and even the preoccupation, of any holy society. In fact, fit in to Dr. Evans, Mores contemporaries had no doubt that More was begining to depict a double-dyed(a) society, whiz firmly based upon the precepts of reason. However, More injects several major flaws in the Utopian formation, which subverts the possibility of that society being truly ideal. In his attempt to expose the inherent limitations of reason, More presents us with the Utopian society, which both benefits and loses from reason in their handling of material wealth, religious toleration, and respect for military man life. More uses the Utopians total rejection of material wealth to present the possibility of reason overcoming petit larceny greed. The Utopians realization that material wealth has little value is, at to the lowest degree on face, one of the higher pinnacles of their civilization. As Raphael says, Nor can they understand how a totally useless substance like grand should now, all over the world, be considered far more important than human beings . . . (89). With this offerment, Raphael is pointing out one of the great flaws of any capitalistic society, that human beings often pursue gold and riches at the expense of human dignity and morality. Some human beings, ... ...posing ideas within it, Thomas More is not only exposing the limits of reason, but he is encouraging intellectual discourse and diversity of opinions. He is challenging ind ividuals and society as a whole to not accept the so-called perfect society, but to think about the consequences that would occur if a Utopian system were to be adopted. Yet he presents to us the notion that even reason has its limitations and is only as good as the person who analyzes the situation. There is no perfect society, no perfect individual, and certainly no Utopia, but that does not mean that we should not strive toward that end. When we use reason, a perfect state of society, or a perfect individual is by no subject matter guaranteed, but at least its a step in the decent direction. Works CitedMore, Thomas. Utopia, ed. And trans. HVS Ogden. AHM Publishing Corporation, Illinois, 1949.